The Court was unpersuaded by arguments that requiring the DEP to obtain permits from itself was contrary to the intent of the Clean Water Act, or that enforcing against itself was a practical impossibility.("WVDEP") appeals an injunction requiring it to obtainNational Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permitsunder the Clean Water Act ("CWA"),see 33 U.S.C. § 1342et seq.The injunction was based on the district court’s conclusionthat the plain language of the CWA and applicable EPA regulationsrequire such a permit.The trial court’s ruling was correct. The text of the CWA,as well as the corresponding regulations issued by the EnvironmentalProtection Agency, confirm that the permit requirementsapply to anyone who discharges pollutants into thewaters of the United States. Under the CWA, it does not matterthat a mining company may have created the conditions, for reclamation efforts at abandoned coal mining sites.that call for reclamation. What matters is that an entity, privateor public, is currently discharging pollutants into thewaters of the United States. In fact, the statute contains noexceptions for state agencies engaging in reclamation efforts;to the contrary, it explicitly includes them within its scope.At bottom, WVDEP’s arguments stem from little more thanpolicy disagreements with the statutory text. Finding that tobe an insufficient basis for deviating from the law as written,we affirm the judgment of the district court.
The decision can be found here. A story on the decision can be found in the AP report in the Gazettte
No comments:
Post a Comment